This court rejected a writ petition filed by Subhash Jadhav against the State of Maharashtra, holding that remedies under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code were available and the petition was misconceived.
Petition stands rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 385 OF 2015
SUBHASH SAHEBRAO JADHAV VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Kulkarni Girish B AGP for Respondents: Mr.N.B.Patil
CORAM : S.S.SHINDE &
V.L.ACHLIYA,JJ.
DATED : 14TH MARCH,2016
PER COURT : -
Remedies are provided under the Maharashtra Land Revenue
Code for the relief prayed in the petition. Petition is misconceived.
The petitioner can approach appropriate authority under the M.L.R. Code. No case is made out. Petition stands rejected.
(V.L.ACHLIYA,J.) (S.S.SHINDE,J.)
umg/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether remedies exist under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code for the relief sought by the petitioner in the writ petition.
SUBHASH SAHEBRAO JADHAV
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.S.SHINDE
V.L.ACHLIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
