In this writ petition under Article 226, the Bombay High Court declined to grant relief for expediting a pending marriage petition, directing the petitioner to approach the Court of Civil Judge Senior Division directly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
prod-16-wp-7010-2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATTE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.7010 OF 2016
Ganesh Maruti Pisal ...Petitioner
vs.
Swati Ganesh Pisal ...Respondent
Mr. R.V. Sankpal, for the Petitioner Mr. S.V. Deshmukh, for the Respondent
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR &
PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 18, 2016
P.C.:
claimed in the Petition for expediting the hearing of the Marriage Petition No. 528 of 2014 pending before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune cannot be granted at this stage. It is open for the Petitioner to apply for expediting the hearing before the same Court.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
1/1
Vishal Parekar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the relief for expediting the marriage petition is grantable at this stage.
Ganesh Maruti Pisal
Swati Ganesh Pisal
SHANTANU S. KEMKAR
PRAKASH D. NAIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
