This court directed the Collector, Palghar, to consider the petitioner's pending application within three months, modifying a previous order due to a change in jurisdiction from Thane to Palghar.
Direction to Collector, Palghar to decide the matter within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
prod-13-wp-4116-2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATTE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4116 OF 2016
Usha Rupabhai Parmar
...Petitioner
vs.
State of Maharashtra and Another
...Respondents
Mr. K.P. Shah, for the Petitioner Mr. Vikas Mali, AGP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 18, 2016
P.C.:
2. Speaking to the Minutes.
1/2
Vishal Parekar
prod-13-wp-4116-2016.doc
the Petitioner's pending application in the light of observation and direction contained in the said order dated 30th September, 2016.
accordingly.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
2/2
Vishal Parekar
Usha Rupabhai Parmar
State of Maharashtra
Shantanu S. Kemkar
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
