The High Court allowed a writ petition alleging the Corporation failed to transfer the petitioner's licence to her son despite multiple opportunities. The matter was disposed of on uncontroverted averments regarding license transfer.
Transfer of the petitioner's licence in the name of her son, Shankar Soni.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP. 696-16
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 696 OF 2016
Smt. Ramraji Jagannath Soni … Petitioner Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Induprakash Tripathi i/b C. K. Tripathi, for the Petitioner. Ms. Shobha Ajit Kumar, for the Respondent - BMC.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & M. S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : APRIL 11, 2016 PC.
. The grievance of the Petitioner is that Respondent – Corporation is not transferring her licence in the name of her son Shankar Soni. Despite several opportunities being given to the Corporation, no reply has been filed by the Corporation, though the petition is pending since 2015. Writ petition is, therefore, allowed and disposed of on the basis of uncontroverted averments made in the petition, in terms of prayer clause (a), without prejudice to the rights of the Corporation, with liberty to apply, if necessary.
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Corporation is bound to transfer the petitioner's licence to her son Shankar Soni.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Ramraji Jagannath Soni
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay
V. M. Kanade
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
