PIL petition was allowed to be withdrawn by the Bombay High Court due to subsequent events, with liberty to file a fresh petition if warranted.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition for subsequent events.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL. 106-09
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 106 OF 2009
Ashok Saremal Sanklesha … Petitioner Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai and Ors. … Respondents
Mr. J. G. Damani, for the Petitioner.
Ms. Rima Paradkar i/b DM Legal Associates for Respondent Nos. 3 to 5.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & M. S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : APRIL 11, 2016 PC.
. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, on instructions, submits that he would like to withdraw the petition on account of subsequent events which have taken place. Hence, PIL is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition / PIL for the purpose of subsequent events.
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Ashok Saremal Sanklesha
The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai
V. M. KANADE
M. S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
