Allowed

Prof. Subhash Shatrughna Rangari v. State of Maha. through Secretary, Ministry of Social Justice and Special Assistance, Mumbai and Ors.

Bombay HC10 Oct 2016WP/685/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought relief which was deemed innocuous. The Court allowed the petition in principle. It directed Respondent no.4 to constitute a committee to consider the petitioner's claim on merits within eight weeks, explicitly stating no merit-based decision was made by this Court.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition allowed in principle; Respondent no.4 directed to constitute a committee to consider the claim on merits within eight weeks.

Prof. Subhash Shatrughna Rangari Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

10.10.wp.685.15

¶2

¶3

IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 685/2016

¶5

(Prof. Subhash Shatrughna Rangari vs. The State of Maharashtra and others )

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders

¶7

.............................................................................................................................................. Mr. R.D.Dhande, Advocate for the petitioner Ms.Tripti Udeshi, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos.1 to 3 Mr. J.Y. Ghurde, Advocate for Respondent no.4 Mr. P. S. Sadavarte, Advocate for Respondent no.5.

¶8

CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED : 10^th October, 2016.

¶9

Heard.

¶10

The petitioner has restricted his claim

¶11

insofar as prayer clause (a) is concerned.

¶12

Taking into consideration the innocuous nature of the claim, we are inclined to allow the petition.

¶13

The respondent no.4 is directed to constitute a Committee for considering the claim of the petitioner. The said Committee shall consider the claim of the petitioner in accordance with law.

¶14

We make it clear that we have not considered the matter on merits and the Committee shall consider the matter on the basis of material placed on record, on its own merit. The same shall be done within a period of eight weeks.

¶15

10.10.wp.685.15

¶16

¶17

With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶18

JUDGEJUDGE

sahare

10.10.wp.685.15

C E R T I F I C A T E

¶23

“ I certify that this Judgment/Order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Judgment/Order.”

¶24

Uploaded by: N.B.Sahare P.S.

¶25

Uploaded on: 10.10.2016.

Prof. Subhash Shatrughna Rangari v. State of Maha. through Secretary, Ministry of Social Justice and Special Assistance, Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prof. Subhash Shatrughna Rangari v. State of Maha. through Secretary, Ministry of Social Justice and Special Assistance, Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Premsagar S/O Vithoba Meshram Vs Gram Panchayat Chicholim through Its Secretary and Others

Kale Impex Private Limited, through Its Director, Mr. Mohan Sudhakar Kale and Others Vs Union of India, through Its Secretary, Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi and Others

The State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary, Dept of Home Mantralaya, Mumbai and Another Vs Gajanan Vitthal Palkar

Shri. Gajanan Maharaj Rugna Seva Samiti, Thr Krushan S/O Shantaram Karpe Akola Vs the State of Maha. Thr Secretary, Mantralaya, Mumbai

Shri Narendramal S/O Mishrimal Bafna Vs Urmila Wd/O Harpalisngh Thakur and Others

Navnath S/O. Domaji Mangar Vs President District Selection Committee and Collector Chandrapur and Others