The Nagpur Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay rejected the present Writ Petition as the court was not inclined to entertain it in its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India due to disputed questions of facts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP1409-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Writ Petition No.1409/2016 (Shri Gajanan Maharaj Rugna Seva Samiti, Akola .vs. The State of Maharashtra and others. )
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Mr. S.D. Chopde, Advocate for Petitioner. Ms. N.P. Mehta, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 3. Mr. S.V. Sohoni, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & V.M. Deshpande, JJ. DATED : October 10, 2016.
In view of the disputed questions of facts, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition in extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Writ petition is rejected.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
2
WP1409-16.odt
Certificate
I certify that this order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed order.
Uploaded by : R.G. Halwai.
Uploaded on: 13.10.2016
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition is maintainable in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in view of disputed questions of facts.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Gajanan Maharaj Rugna Seva Samiti, Akola
The State of Maharashtra
others
B.R. Gavai
V.M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
