High Court dismissed the criminal writ petition as the petitioner had an alternate remedy available, choosing not to entertain the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7.WP.682.16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 682 OF 2016
Manoj Baburao Gadekar ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
State of Maharashtra and Another ..RESPONDENTS
Mr. S.D. Kotkar, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.P. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for respondents.
CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ. DATED : 13th JUNE, 2016
ORDER :
( A.I.S. CHEEMA, J. ) (A.V. NIRGUDE, J.)
SSD
1 / 1
Manoj Baburao Gadekar
State of Maharashtra
A.V. NIRGUDE
A.I.S. CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
