High Court condoned a 452-day delay in filing a review application and disposed of the civil application arising from a writ petition dated 2001.
Review application filed with condonation of delay of 452 days was allowed; underlying civil application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca1452.16
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1452 OF 2016
IN
REVIEW APPLICATION ST. NO. 1740 OF 2016
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 2460 OF 2001
(Kalabai Vithal Nikalje – died through her LRs. Vs. The Village
Development Officer, Ashti, Dist. Beed. & ors.)
Office Notes,Office MemorandaCourt's or Judge's orders
of Coram,appearances, Court's
orders or directions andCORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE &
Registrar's ordersA.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.
CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE &
A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.
DATED : 24.02.2016
Mr.V.M.Chate,Advocateforthe
applicants.
Mr.S.P.Sonpawale,A.G.P. for respondent/
State.
1.Heard. For the reasons mentioned
in the application, the delay of 452 days
caused in filing review application stands
condoned.
2.TheCivilApplicationis
accordingly allowed and disposed of.
[A.I.S.CHEEMA,J.][A.V.NIRGUDE,J.]
snk/2016/FEB16 /ca1452.16
Kalabai Vithal Nikalje (died through her LRs)
The Village Development Officer, Ashti, Dist. Beed & ors.
A.V. NIRQUDE
A.I.S. CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court