A withdrawal petition filed by the petitioner was admitted, and the main writ petition (WP No. 665 of 2015) was disposed of as withdrawn.
Leave was given to withdraw the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
suresh
903-WP-665.2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.665 OF 2015
Yogesh Ganjawala & Others .... Petitioners Vs. Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority & Others .... Respondents
Mr. Suraj Iyer i/by M/s. Ganesh and Company for the Petitioners.
Ms Madhubala Kajale, AGP, for the Respondent Nos.3 to 6.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : JULY 05, 2016
P.C:
In the presence of the petitioner No.1, the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition. Leave granted. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Yogesh Ganjawala & Others
Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority & Others
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
