The High Court of Bombay dismissed the civil application without considering it of urgency, holding that no urgency existed in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
911-CAW-1616-2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1616 OF 2016 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2945 OF 2015
NARAYAN PANDURANG KORGAONKAR )...APPLICANT
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
M/S.KORAL BUILDERS AND ORS. )...PETITIONERS V/s. PARSHWANATH CO-OP. BANK LTD. & ORS. )...RESPONDENTS
Mr.Ashish Mehta a/w. Ms.Shivani Deshmukh, Mr.Amit G. & Ms.Shivani Jadeja i/b. Ashish Mehta, Advocate for the Applicant in CAW No.1616 of 2016.
Mr.Harshad Shinganapurkar i/b. Amit B.Borkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 in CAW No.1616 of 2016 and for the Petitioner in Writ Petition No.5479 of 2015.
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2525 OF 2015 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.5479 OF 2015
CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI & DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 7th JULY 2016.
P.C. :
1 Heard.
We do not think that there is any urgency. The Civil Application is dismissed.
(DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
avk 1/1
Narayan Pandurang Korgaonkar
M/s. Koral Builders and Ors.
S.C. Dharmadhikari
Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
