In this writ petition, the petitioner moved for time to place pursis on record for withdrawal. The High Court noted the petitioner's instruction to withdraw and disposed of the petition accordingly, deeming separate pursis unnecessary.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn; separate pursis held unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
2906wp6574.14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.6574 OF 2014
(Ajit Bhaiyasaheb Mulik vs. Nagpur Improvement Trust and others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Shri S.V. Sirpurkar, Advocate for petitioner. Shri A.A. Naik, Advocate for respondent no.3.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.
DATED : JUNE 29, 2016
Heard Adv. Sirpurkar for petitioner and Adv. Naik for respondent no.3. Nobody appears for respondent nos.1 and 2.
Adv. Sirpurkar is seeking time to place on record a pursis signed by petitioner for withdrawal of petition.
Since Adv. Sirpurkar has instructions from petitioner to withdraw the petition, we do not find it necessary to have any pursis on record. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
JUDGE JUDGE
khj
Ajit Bhaiyasaheb Mulik
Nagpur Improvement Trust
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
INDIRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
