Disposed

Fanindrakumar Laxman Baghele v. Zilla Parishad, Bhandara, Thr. Its Chief Executive Officer, Bhandara and Others

Bombay HC28 Jun 2016CAW/415/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed a civil application subsequently brought on record. It directed amendments be carried out within one week and granted the respondents liberty to file additional reply within two weeks before listing the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Amendments allowed within one week; liberty to file additional reply within two weeks; writ petition listed on 19.07.2016.

Fanindrakumar Laxman Baghele v. Zilla Parishad, Bhandara, Thr. Its Chief Executive Officer, Bhandara and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Fanindrakumar Laxman Baghele v. Zilla Parishad, Bhandara, Thr. Its Chief Executive Officer, Bhandara and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anandrao Maru Mesram and 8 Others Vs State of Mah., through Its Secretary, Revenue and Forest Dept. and 2 Others

Panchsheel Education Society, Bramhapuri through Secretary, Ashok Pandharinathji Ramteke Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, School Education and Sports Dept. Mumbai and 2 Others

Keshav Raj Kranthi, the Director, Central Institute of Cotton Reserch and Another Vs Nitin Nandkishore Zade

Sushma Ganpatrao Shendre (Sushma Vinodrao Raikwar) Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Secretary, Department of School Education and 4 Others

Ku. Jaya Pralhadrao Dhakite Vs Shir Shiwaji Education Society, Amravati through Its Secretary, Shri v. G. Bhamburkar and Another

Shri. Shrikrishna Madhao Khare Vs (Ntpc) Ltd. through Its Chairman and Managinr Director, New Delhi and Others