The High Court granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition consequently discharging the rule and disposing of pending civil applications without costs.
Leave to withdraw granted. Rule discharged. Pending applications disposed of. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
10 WP/6343/2015
MOMIN AZIZKHAN GANI KHAN
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. M.K. Deshpande AGP for Respondents: Mr. A.R. Kale
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & K.L. WADANE, JJ. Date: July 22, 2016
PER COURT :-
1 Counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Communication received by the counsel from the petitioner is placed on record and marked ‘X’ for identification.
( K.L. WADANE, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
MOMIN AZIZKHAN GANI KHAN
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
R. M. BORDE
K.L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
