Allowed

Shubham Suresh Jalalwad v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC21 Jul 2016WP/3363/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought admission to the third year of an engineering course based on Scheduled Tribe status. Court directed the scrutiny committee to verify his certificate within eight months and the college to permit him to pursue studies pending the decision.

What did the court decide?

Directed the scrutiny committee to verify the tribe certificate within eight months and the college to permit the petitioner to pursue the Third Year engineering degree course.

Shubham Suresh Jalalwad Vs the State of Maharashtra… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

- 1 -

¶2

WP 3363/16

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

 WRIT PETITION NO.3363/2016

¶6

Shubham Suresh Jalalwad.

¶7

...Petitioner..

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Maharashtra & others.

¶10

...Respondents...

¶11

 .....

¶12

Shri A.P. Piratwad, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri V.M. Kagne, AGP for respondent no.1.
Respondent no.2 served.

¶13

Srhi A.V. Hon, Advocate for respondent no.4.

¶14

 .....

¶15

CORAM: R.M. BORDE & K.L. WADANE, JJ.

¶16

DATE: 21.07.2016

¶17

ORDER :

¶18

1]The petitioner claims to belong to Mannervarlu

¶19

scheduled tribe and is in receipt of certificate issued

¶20

by the competent authority containing such certification.

¶21

The tribe certificate issued to the petitioner is

¶22

referred to the respondent no.2 – scrutiny committee for
verification and the proposal is stated to be pending.

¶23

2]The petitioner contends that as a result of his

¶24

failure to submit the tribe validation certificate, the

¶25

WP 3363/16

¶26

- 2 -

¶27

college authorities have not permitted him to secure

¶28

admission to the Third Year engineering degree course.

¶29

3]In view of above facts, this petition can be

¶30

disposed of by issuing directions to the respondent no.2
– committee to decide the tribe verification claim of the
petitioner as expeditiously as possible and preferably
within a period of eight months from today and it is
accordingly directed.

¶31

4]Learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.4 on
instructions states that during pendency and finalization

¶32

of the tribe certificate verification claim by the
scrutiny committee, the petitioner would be permitted to
prosecute further studies. The respondent no.4 – college

¶33

as such shall permit the petitioner to secure admission
to Third Year engineering degree course and pursue
further studies.

¶34

5]In view of above, writ petition is disposed of.
There shall be no order as to costs.

¶35

 (K.L. WADANE, J.) (R.M. BORDE, J.)

¶36

ndk/ c2171614.doc

Shubham Suresh Jalalwad v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shubham Suresh Jalalwad v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prakash Sunderrao Solanke and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Valay Construction Private Ltd. through Its Authorized Signatory Mahendra Murlidhar Patil and Anothe Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shrikrishna Ramdas Gullapelli Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Abdul Riyaz Abdul Wahed Deshmukh Died Lrs Abdul Salim Abdul Riyaz Deshmukh and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Santosh Lingam Patwekar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Piraji Amrata Ambhore Died Lrs Digambar Piraji Ambhaore Died Lrs Namdeo Digambar Ambhore and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others