Disposed

Bhanudas Laxman Sakhare and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC1 Aug 2016WP/6288/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad disposed of a challenge regarding the inclusion of petitioners in the Below Poverty Line (BPL) list. The court found the grievance substantially redressed via an affidavit submission.

What did the court decide?

None granted. The court held the grievance was substantially redressed and advised approaching the Collector regarding ineligible families.

Bhanudas Laxman Sakhare and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others — Bombay HC (2016) — LawSathi Research

¶1

WP 6288/14

¶2

- 1 -

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.6288/2014

¶5

Bhanudas Laxman Sakhare & others.

¶6

...Petitioners..

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Maharashtra & others.

¶9

...Respondents...

¶10

 .....

¶11

Shri A.R. Rathod, Advocate for petitioners.

¶12

Shri A.R. Kale, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 6.
Shri R.C. Joshi, Advocate for respondent no.7.
Shri P.M. Gaikwad, Advocate for respondent nos.8 & 10.

¶13

 .....

¶14

CORAM: R.M. BORDE & K.L. WADANE, JJ.

¶15

DATE: 01.08.2016

¶16

ORDER :

¶17

1]In the affidavit in reply presented on behalf of

¶18

respondent nos.3 & 4, it is recorded in paragraph no.15

¶19

that the petitioner nos.1 to 5, 7, 8, 10 and 11 have

¶20

obtained requisite score thereby rendering them eligible

¶21

for inclusion in the BPL list of village Virgaon

¶22

Tq.Vaijapur Dist.Aurangabad. It is further recorded that

¶23

since there is a limit of 84 families prescribed for

¶24

inclusion in the BPL list and since the list has already
been exhausted, the petitioners' names are required to be

¶25

WP 6288/14

¶26

- 2 -

¶27

placed in the waiting list. It is further recorded that

¶28

as and when any of the 84 families included in the BPL

¶29

list gets deleted for any reason mentioned in the
Government resolution dated 27.8.2010, the claim of the
petitioners for inclusion in the BPL list would be
considered.

¶30

2]In view of the statement made in paragraph no.15 of

¶31

the affidavit in reply, the grievance raised by the
petitioners in the instant petition substantially stands
redressed. The petitioners also claim that there are

¶32

many ineligible families included in the BPL list. It

¶33

would be open for the petitioners to tender appropriate
complaint / representation to the Collector setting out

¶34

particulars therein and it would be open for the
Collector to consider such complaint / representation by
himself or by his subordinate officer including the
Project Director, District Rural Development Authority,
expeditiously.

¶35

3]In view of above, writ petition is disposed of.

¶36

ndk/ c18167.doc

¶37

 (K.L. WADANE, J.)

Bhanudas Laxman Sakhare and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhanudas Laxman Sakhare and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vitthal Sayanna Dawewar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Girnai Paryavaran Sanrakshan Va Bahuuddeshiya Sanstha through Dhondu Bajirao Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Babanrao Dashrath Dongre Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Balu Maroti Isankarle Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Ambeshwar Gramin Bigarsheti Sahakari Patasanstha Ltd. through Its Secretary B C Kokate Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shahoobai Baliram Narlawar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others