This disposal order declares that in pursuance of a previous order, the respondent filed an affidavit stating the investigation report will be submitted within two weeks. Consequently, the writ petition stands disposed of without further adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 605 OF 2016
(Shailabai w/o Gulab Wankhede Vs. The State of
Maharashtra and another)
Mr. M.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. A.R. Borulkar, A.P.P. for the respondent/State
CORAM :S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 14th September, 2016
PER COURT :
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner
and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
2.In pursuance of the order dated 11th July, 2016,
passed by this Court, respondent No. 2 has filed the
affidavit. It appears that as per the directions issued
by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhule on
30th June, 2015, further investigation has been carried
by the concerned Investigating Officer. The learned
A.P.P., on instructions, submits that the concerned
Investigating Officer will submit the investigation
report to the concerned Court within a period of two
criwp605-2016
2
weeks from today. In the light of above developments,
the writ petition stands disposed of.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL][S.S. SHINDE]
JUDGE JUDGE
[S.S. SHINDE]
npj/criwp605-2016
Shailabai w/o Gulab Wankhede
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. SHINDE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court