The Writ Petitioner and her Advocate were absent. The Writ Petition, placed on the court board since 01/09/2016 and adjourned for paucity of time, stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 6007-15.doc-3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.6007 OF 2015
Roopali Amit Waikar. ] ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ] ... Respondents
None for Petitioner.
Mr. Sanjay Udeshi i/b M/s. Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for Respondent No.2.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, AND B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE :- OCTOBER 19, 2016
P. C. :-
The Writ Petition is placed on board on several occasions. The name of the petitioner and her Advocate has been correctly displayed on the board. The Writ Petition has been on our board from 01/09/2016. It was adjourned for paucity of time till today. The Writ Petitioner and the Advocate both are absent. The Writ Petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
URS 1 of 1
Roopali Amit Waikar
The State of Maharashtra
S. C. Dharmadhikari
B. P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
