The Single Judge disposed of this criminal writ petition as infructuous in light of subsequent developments, noting that the sugar factory is now being operated by Respondent No.4 in a PIL context.
The writ petition stands disposed of as it does not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 4592-14.doc-906
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4592 OF 2014
Ninaidevi Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. ] ... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ] ... Respondents
Mr. A. A. Kumbhakoni, Senior Advocate, a/w Mr. Ashutosh M. Kulkarni for Petitioner.
Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP for State.
Mr. Hrishikesh Mundargi for Respondent No.4.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, AND B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE :- OCTOBER 19, 2016
P. C. :-
In the light of the subsequent development and when the sugar factory is now being operated by the respondent no.4 in the PIL, this Criminal Writ Petition does not survive and stands disposed of.
(B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
URS 1 of 1
Ninaidevi Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.4
S. C. DHARMADHIKARI
B. P. COLABAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
