Writ petition dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the petitioner on the day of hearing. Earlier dismissal was subsequently set aside.
Dismissal of the writ petition for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
31 wp5968-15
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.5968 OF 2015
Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
None for the petitioner
CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : AUGUST 24, 2016
P.C.:
3 Thereafter, he again mentioned the matter for restoration and same was allowed.
4 Today also, when the matter was called out, no one appeared on behalf of petitioner.
5 Hence, Writ Petition stands dismissed for default.
JUDGE
Mohite
1/1
PETITIONER
RESPONDENT
K. K. TATED
MOHITE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
