The High Court of Bombay Civil Appellate Jurisdiction dismissed a civil revision application due to default as no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. The judgment is a one-line order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2 cra 573-15=.doc
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 573 OF 2015
Office Notes, Court’s or Judge’s orders Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
None for the applicant.
CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATED : 23/08/2016
P.C.:
. None for the Applicant.
2 On earlier occasion also no one appeared on behalf of Applicant. Hence, matter placed today under caption for dismissal.
3 As no one appeared on behalf of Petitioner, Civil Revision Application stands dismissed for default.
(K.K.TATED, J.)
1/1
Sneha Chavan
Sneha Chavan
K. K. Tated
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
