Petitioners sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The court granted leave and disposed of the petition as withdrawn. Case ends there.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
909 WRIT PETITION NO. 5562 OF 2015
ANIL PRAKASH PAWAR AND OTHERS VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. A.V. Hon AGP for Respondents: Mr. S.Y. Mahajan Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. C.A. Jadhav
... CORAM : R. M. BORDE & K.L. WADANE, JJ. Date: May 03, 2016
PER COURT :-
( K.L. WADANE, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
ANIL PRAKASH PAWAR AND OTHERS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
R. M. BORDE
K.L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
