The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of a writ petition concerning the appointment of a petitioner as Principal. The court held that the grievance was redressed as the University order approving the appointment, subject to pending review petitions, was on record.
-
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
WP 3113/16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3113/2016
Khandesh College Education Society
and another.
...Petitioners..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & another.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri V.D. Hon, Senior Advocate i/b Shri A.V. Hon,
Advocate for petitioners.
Shri D.R. Kale, AGP for respondent no.1.
Shri A.B. Girase, Advocate for respondent no.2.
.....
CORAM: R.M. BORDE &
K.L. WADANE, JJ.
DATE: 02.05.2016
ORDER :
1]Learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.2 -
University presents on record the order issued on
30.4.2016 according approval to the appointment of the
petitioner no.2 as a Principal subject to the decision in
the Review Petition (St) No.8651/2016 and Writ Petition
No.4376/2016. Copy of the order is taken on record and
marked as Exhibit X for identification.
- 2 -
2]In this view of the matter, the grievance raised by
the petitioners stands redressed. Keeping the option of
the petitioners open to avail of the remedies available
in law as and when cause of action accrues, the writ
petition is disposed of.
(K.L. WADANE, J.) (R.M. BORDE, J.)
ndk/ cr251618.doc
Khandesh College Education Society
another
The State of Maharashtra
another
R.M. BORDE
K.L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court