This court disposed of a writ petition challenging the suspension of the petitioner. The court held that since the enquiry leading to termination was already concluded, no relief was required in this petition. The writ petition was dismissed.
Writ petition disposed of; no further relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 5551/15
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.5551/2015
Baban Bajairao Khillari.
...Petitioner..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri S.R. Barlinge, Advocate for petitioner.
Smt.M.A. Deshpande, AGP for respondent nos.1 & 2.
Shri Vivek Dhage, Advocate for respondent no.3.
.....
CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA &
K.L. WADANE, JJ.
DATE: 15.12.2016
ORDER :
1]Mr.Vivek Dhage, learned counsel for the respondent
no.3 submits that the enquiry as against the petitioner
is complete and the petitioner is terminated.
2]This petition assails the order of suspension of the
petitioner. As the enquiry against the petitioner is
already concluded, nothing would survive in the present
writ petition. Writ petition as such is disposed of. No
costs.
(K.L. WADANE, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) ndk/ c15121610.doc
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition assailing suspension is maintainable when the enquiry resulting in termination is already complete.
Baban Bajairao Khillari
The State of Maharashtra
others
S.V. Gangapurwala
K.L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court