Single-line order disposing of a contempt petition after accepting the Education Officer's undertaking to take further steps within one month following government approval for repatriation.
Contempt petition disposed of; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CP 106/16 in WP 6276/15
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.106/2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6276/2015
Javedkhan Mustafa Pathan
and others.
...Petitioners..
Versus
Sanjaykumar Rathod.
...Respondent...
.....
Shri S.B. Solunke, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri U.B. Bondar, Advocate for respondent.
.....
CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA &
K.L. WADANE, JJ.
DATE: 15.12.2016
ORDER :
1]It is submitted that subsequently the Government has
taken a decision on 21.10.2016 wherein repatriation is
allowed.
2]Mr.U.B. Bondar, on instructions of the Education
Officer, states that further steps would be taken by the
Education Officer within one month. The said statement
is accepted.
3]In view of above, contempt petition is disposed of.
No costs.
(K.L. WADANE, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
ndk/ c1512162.doc
Javedkhan Mustafa Pathan and others
Sanjaykumar Rathod
K.L. Wadane
S.V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court