completed and the construction of buildings and thereafter handing over the same to the statutory authority will take place in phase wise manner, we do not think that in Writ Jurisdiction we should interfere at the instance of the sole Petitioner, who says that he is inconvenienced because of the order passed under section 95A of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976. That power, which is vested in the authority is to facilitate redevelopment and reconstruction of the buildings which are old and dilapidated which have been existing for number of years or decades together, then, all the more we should not interfere in Writ Jurisdiction. Like everybody else, the Petitioner suffered some inconvenience, but that by itself is no ground to interfere. The Petitioner is found eligible for permanent alternate accommodation and for transit benefits and after completion of the project, there would be an allotment by lottery system and at that stage all units/tenements would be included in the lottery and which are part of the newly constructed buildings. Therefore, we are disinclined to consider Mr.Mooman's request to give some time to vacate the premises.
