Swani Colrporation v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petitions filed in 2013 were dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioners and their advocates were absent on the date of hearing.
Writ petitions filed in 2013 were dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioners and their advocates were absent on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7-wp-1125-13
DSS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1125 OF 2013
Swami Corporation ... Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and ors. ... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1503 OF 2013 Swani Spice Mills Pvt. Ltd. ... Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. ... Respondents
None for the Petitioners in both Petitions. Ms P.H. Kantharia, Govt. Pleader for Respondent No.1 Mr. M.G. Patil i/b Mr. N.N. Bhadrashete for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & M. S. SONAK, JJ.
DATE : 11 FEBRUARY 2016.
P. C.
1] The Petitioners and their Advocates are absent.
2] We find that these Writ Petitions are pending in this Court from 2013. There are two Advocates whose names are displayed, but both are absent and equally the Petitioners. The Writ Petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution.
1 / 1
Swami Corporation
Swani Spice Mills Pvt. Ltd.
The State of Maharashtra
S.C. Dharmadikari
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court