Dismissed

Sajid Ali Abid Ali v. the Honble Chief Minister, and 3 Ors.

Bombay HC12 Feb 2016WP/515/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Three writ petitions were filed regarding a communication concerning Slum Rehabilitation Authority proceedings. The court disposed of the petitions after recording a memo withdrawing a previous communication and stay order.

What did the court decide?

The writ petitions and chamber summonses were disposed of after recording the withdrawal of a prior stay order and communication.

Sajid Ali Abid Ali Vs the Honble Chief… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

912-WPL.234.2016+.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 234 OF 2016 WITH

¶4

CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO. 57 OF 2016 AND

¶5

CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO. 54 OF 2016 (NOT ON BOARD)

¶6

Sayeeda Gulamrasul Sayed } Petitioner versus The Hon'ble Chief Minister } and Ors. } Respondents

¶7

WITH

¶8

WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 237 OF 2016 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO. 58 OF 2016 AND CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO. 55 OF 2016

¶9

Sajid Ali Abid Ali } Petitioner versus The Hon'ble Chief Minister } and Ors. } Respondents

¶10

WITH

¶11

WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 238 OF 2016 WITH

¶12

CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO. 56 OF 2016 AND

¶13

CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO. 53 OF 2016 (NOT ON BOARD)

¶14

Lilahi Mehboob Ansari } Petitioner versus The Hon'ble Chief Minister } and Ors. } Respondents

¶15

Mr. P. K. Dhakephalkar – Senior Advocate i/b. Mr. Ajay S. Patil for the Petitioner in WPL/234/2016.

¶16

Page 1 of 3

¶17

J.V.Salunke,PA

¶18

912-WPL.234.2016+.doc

¶19

Mr. Chirag Balsara i/b. Mr. Ajay S. Patil for the Petitioner in WPL/237/2016.

¶20

Mr. Ajay Patil for the Petitioner in WPL/238/2016.

¶21

Mr. Umashankar Upadhyay – AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in WPL/234/2016.

¶22

Mr. Anurag Gokhale – AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in WPL/237/2016 and WPL/238/2016.

¶23

Mr. Venkatesh Dhond – Senior Advocate with Mr. Girish D. Utangale i/b. M/s. Utangale and Co. for Respondent No. 3 SRA in All matters.

¶24

Mr. Shyam Mehta – Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Fernandes i/b. Mr. Jayesh R. Vyas for the Applicant in CHSWL/53/2016.

¶25

Mr. A. Diamondwalla and Ms. Sheetal Angavne i/b. M/s. Diamondwalla and Co. for the Applicant in CHSWL/56/2016, CHSWL/57/2016, CHSWL/58/2016.

¶26

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & M. S. SONAK, JJ.

¶27

DATED :- FEBRUARY 12, 2016

¶28

P.C. :-

¶29

Mr. Upadhyay appearing for the State has produced

¶30

before us a copy of the communication dated 12^th February, 2016 addressed by the Under Secretary, Government of Maharashtra, Department of Housing, Mantralaya, Mumbai. It is addressed to the Chief Executive Officer of the Slum Rehabilitation Authority,

¶31

Page 2 of 3

¶32

J.V.Salunke,PA

¶33

912-WPL.234.2016+.doc

¶34

informing him that the letter/communication referred in this letter, namely the communication dated 28^th January, 2016 stands withdrawn and the order of stay also comes to an end. It stands cancelled.

¶35

A certified true copy of this communication dated 12^th February, 2016 is taken on record and marked as 'X' for identification. In the light of the same, we do not think that the Writ Petitions need to be entertained any further and are disposed of accordingly. If in future and by any course adopted or action initiated, either the Petitioners or the Interveners are aggrieved, they are free to pursue their remedy and in accordance with law. The disposal of these Writ Petitions by taking this communication on record will not prejudice the rights and contentions of either parties.

¶36

The Chamber Summonses for intervention do not survive and are disposed of as such.

¶37

(M.S.SONAK, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)

¶38

Page 3 of 3

¶39

J.V.Salunke,PA

Sajid Ali Abid Ali v. the Honble Chief Minister, and 3 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sajid Ali Abid Ali v. the Honble Chief Minister, and 3 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Swani Colrporation Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Swani Spice Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

M/S. Karimjee Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors. Mithwalal Chawl Co-Op.Hsg. Society (Proposed)

Ashok Dagdopant Khillare Vs High Court of Judicature at Bombay, through the Registrar General, High Court of Bombay and Anr.

Jagdish Gangadhar Kakad Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Dr. Prem Balram Nichani and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.