Disposed
Priti Sanjay Wankhede and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCWP/5145/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 10-wp5145.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5145 OF 2016
PRITI SANJAY WANKHEDE AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr.P.N.Nagargoje, Advocate for petitioners
Mr.P.N.Kutti, AGP for respondent no.1
Mr.C.A.Jadhav, Advocate for respondent no.3
Mr.Alok Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.4
Mr.Abhijit Namde, Advocate for respondent no.5
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 14, 2016
PER COURT :
Heard.
2]The learned Counsel appearing for respondent
no.3, on instructions, makes a statement that the
petitioners will be allowed to appear for the
examination of G.N.M. course for the academic year
2015-2016.
2 10-wp5145.odt
3]In the light of the above statement made by
the learned Counsel appearing for respondent no.3
and as informed by the learned Counsel for the
petitioners and the learned Counsel for respondent
no.5, that Hall Tickets are already issued,
nothingsurvivesinthispetitionfor
consideration.
4] The Writ Petition stands disposed accordingly.[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.]
kbp
PRITI SANJAY WANKHEDE AND OTHERS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
S.S. SHINDE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court