Petitioner absent. Court noted availability of alternate remedy in appropriate forum. Petition disposed of without substantive decision. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
42-wp-510-16.doc
Ladda(PS).
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 510 of 2016
T.A. Mohammad Badruddin
..Petitioner.
Vs.
State Bank of India & Ors
..Respondents.
None for the Petitioner. Mr Vivek S. Sawant for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA AND A.S.GADKARI, JJ. DATE : 6th DECEMBER, 2016
ORDER :
None for the petitioner on 30th November, 2016 and today also none present for the petitioner. However, the petitioner has alternate remedy to challenge the impugned order before the appropriate Forum being the tenant of the premises in question. All contentions are kept open. Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
(A.S. GADKARI, J.)
(ANOOP V. MOHTA,J)
1 /1
T.A. Mohammad Badruddin
State Bank of India
Anoop V. Mohta
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
