The writ petition challenging interim relief was disposed of as infructuous because the main matter was already decided by an order dated 5th December 2016.
The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
37-wp-11757-16.doc
Ladda(PS).
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 11757 of 2016.
Jyoti Kadam
..Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors
..Respondents.
Mr Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate a/with Mr S.P. Sarnath for the Petitioner. Mr V.N. Sagare, A.G.P. for the Respondent no. 1 and 2. Mr Sandeep Phatak for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA AND A.S.GADKARI, JJ. DATE : 6th DECEMBER, 2016
ORDER :
The learned Counsel for the parties makes a joint statement that the main matter itself is disposed of by an order dated 5th December, 2016. Therefore, the present writ petition arising out of interim relief has become infructuous. The petition is therefore disposed of as infructuous.
(A.S. GADKARI, J.)
(ANOOP V. MOHTA,J)
1 /1
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
nullReferred
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jyoti Kadam
State of Maharashtra
Others
Anoop V. Mota
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
