The High Court disposed of the writ petition as the respondents stated instructions to withdraw the earlier complaint, thereby redressing the petitioner's grievance without further adjudication.
The writ petition stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp4915.16.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 4915 OF 2016
Manjur Pragat Shetkari Vividh Karyakari Sahakari Sanstha Ltd. Majur.
.. PETITIONER
VERSUS
State of Maharashtra & others
.. RESPONDENTS
Mr. K.J. Suryawanshi, advocate for petitioner. Mr. V.M. Kangne, AGP for the State.
Mr. N.V. Gaware, advocate for respondent no. 3.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE &
K. L. WADANE, JJ. DATE : 10th AUGUST, 2016.
PER COURT :
( K. L. WADANE ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb
Manjur Pragat Shetkari Vividh Karyakari Sahakari Sanstha Ltd.
State of Maharashtra
R.M. BORDE
K. L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
