This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP. 4780-16
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 4780 OF 2016
Smt. Usha Rupabhai Parmar … Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Kayval P. Shah, for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. G. Sawant, for the Respondents.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & Ms. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 13, 2016
PC.
. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that in a connected petition, consent terms have been filed, and therefore, this petition has become infructuous. Writ petition is, therefore, disposed of as it has become infructuous.
Sd/Sd/-
[Ms. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Smt. Usha Rupabhai Parmar
State of Maharashtra
V. M. KANADE
Ms. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
