High Court in Criminal Writ Petition held that sufficient allegations existed in the complaint against the petitioners (mother-in-law and husband), finding no case for quashing. Petition dismissed but liberty granted to seek trial court discharge.
Liberty granted to file application for discharge before the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP. 4255-16
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 4255 OF 2016
Shashikant Anand Khatte & Anr. … Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
Ms. C. S. Gangane, for the Petitioners.
Dr. F. R. Shaikh, APP for Respondent No. 1.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & Ms. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 16, 2016
PC.
. We find that there are sufficient allegations in the
complaint against the mother-in-law and the husband (petitioners herein), and no case is made out for quashing the complaint. Writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. Liberty is granted to the Petitioners to file an application for discharge before the trial court. Writ petition
is accordingly disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
Sd/Sd/[Ms. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the allegations in the complaint were sufficient to withdraw an application for quashing the FIR.
Shashikant Anand Khatte & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
V. M. KANADE
Nutan D. SARDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
