The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, disposed of Writ Petition No.4736/2005 because the petitioner had expired, causing the petition to abate.
No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.4736/2005
Shamrao S/o Ganaji Jadhav
..Vs..
The State of Maharashtra, through its Principal Secretary, the Revenue and Forest Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED : 19.12.2016.
The notice issued to the petitioner for engagement of another counsel is received back with remark that the petitioner has expired. In that view of the matter, the petition stands disposed of as having been abated. Rule is discharged. No costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
Tambaskar .
Shamrao S/o Ganaji Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
V.M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
