Disposed

Namdev Shivaji Patil and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC20 Apr 2016WP/4710/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Three writ petitions challenging state actions were disposed of summarily. The court directed petitioners to submit a representation to the competent authority within two weeks after relying on a prior order in Kiran Namdeo Shinde.

What did the court decide?

Directions to submit representation within two weeks; authority to decide on merits within four months.

Namdev Shivaji Patil and Ors. Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

Sr.No. 908

¶2

WP 4709.16

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4709 OF 2016

¶4

Sanjay Tukaram Jadhav & ors. ..Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents with WRIT PETITION NO. 4710 OF 2016

¶5

Namdev Shivaji Patil & ors. ..Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents

¶6

with WRIT PETITION NO. 4725 OF 2016

¶7

Tonape Milind Ramchandra & ors. ..Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents

¶8

Mr. Rajaram Deshmukh, advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Molina P. Thakur, AGP for the State.

¶9

CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & RANJIT MORE, J J. DATE : 20^th APRIL, 2016.

¶10

P. C. :

¶11

Parties through their counsel.

¶12

Mr. Deshmukh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the question involved in these petitions is covered by the order dated 21^st September, 2013, passed by the Division Bench of this Court

Shubhada S Kadam 1/2

Sr.No. 908

WP 4709.16

in the case of Kiran Namdeo Shinde and ors. vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors. in writ petition No.2358 of 2013 and other connected writ petitions. He submitted that these petitions may be disposed of by directing the appropriate authority to consider and take an appropriate decision on the petitioners' claim. He submitted that the petitioners shall submit representation before the competent authority within two weeks from today.

¶17

In view of the aforesaid statement, as agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, these petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to submit the representation before the competent authority within two weeks. On receipt of the same, the competent authority shall examine it and, in case, the petitioners' case is based on the decision of the Division Bench in Kiran Namdeo Shinde (supra), an appropriate decision and consequential relief may be granted in their favour within four months from the date of receipt of such representation. Accordingly, the petitions stand disposed of.

¶18

[RANJIT MORE, J.]

¶19

[SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.]

¶20

2/2

¶21

Shubhada S Kadam

Namdev Shivaji Patil and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Namdev Shivaji Patil and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Flora Lalitkumar Shah Vs the President/ Secretary and 4 Ors.

Vijay Baburao Ghuge Vs Vice Chancellor University of Pune and Ors.

Smt. Ranjana Vinod Kejriwal Vs Mr. Omprakash L. Changoiwal and Ors.

Mr. Arvind Suryakant Parelkar Alias Paralkar and 4 Ors. Vs Mandakini Surendra Parelkar Alias Paralkar and 3 Ors.

Sambhajee Ramchandra Deshmukh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mr. Shamrao Baburao Thorat Vs the State of Maharashtra through Joint Director and Ors.