The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the petitioner was absorbed by the subsequent order of the District Education Officer, rendering the relief sought unnecessary.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order dated 17th August, 2009, vacated; related civil applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 461.2005
Sr.No.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 461 OF 2005
Sambhajee Ramchandra Deshmukh ..Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents
None for the petitioner. Mr. P. G. Sawant, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Dilip Bodke, advocate for respondent No.3.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & RANJIT MORE, J J. DATE : 20th APRIL, 2016.
P. C. :
None for the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3 states that in view of the subsequent development of passing of the order dated 26th December, 2014, by the District Education Officer(Secondary), the petitioner has been absorbed in Rayat Shikshan Sanstha, Satara, where he has already joined and he is no more in the school run by the 3rd respondent and as a result, the petition has rendered infructuous.
Shubhada S Kadam 1/2
WP 461.2005
Sr.No.16
learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3 to be correct. As a result, we dismiss this petition as infructuous. The interim order dated 17th August, 2009, passed in civil application No.1624 of 2009 stands vacated.
[RANJIT MORE, J.] [SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.]
2/2
Shubhada S Kadam
Sambhajee Ramchandra Deshmukh
State of Maharashtra
others
3rd Respondent
Shantanu Kemkar
Ranjit More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
