Rejection of writ petition challenging Central Administrative Tribunal's finding that no discrimination occurred regarding petitioner's seniority and promotion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP4662-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Writ Petition No.4662/2016 (Prakashnath Jokhan Gaud .vs. Union of India through General Manager and others.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Mr. V.R. Thote, Advocate for Petitioner
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & V.M. Deshpande, JJ. DATED : August 24, 2016.
2
WP4662-16.odt
therefore, found that the contention of the petitioner that he was discriminated in the matter of seniority promotion as against respondent nos. 3 and 4 was devoid of substance.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
3
WP4662-16.odt
Certificate
I certify that this order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed order.
Uploaded by : R.G. Halwai.
Uploaded on: 25.8.2016
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner was discriminated against in matter of seniority and promotion.
Whether the findings of the Central Administrative Tribunal regarding appointment history and formations require interference.
Prakashnath Jokhan Gaud
Union of India
B.R. Gavai
V.M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
