A writ petition was disposed of as infructuous because the affidavit filed by the respondents rendered the grievance no longer alive.
The petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24.8WP.3977.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 3977 OF 2016. (Diwan Afreen Begum Shamsher & others .vs. The State of Maharashtra & others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. B.G. Kulkarni, Advocate for petitioners. Ms. N.P. Mehta, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 24, 2016.
The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the affidavit filed by the respondent nos. 1 to 3, specifically paragraph no. 3 thereof, the grievance of the petitioners no more survives.
The petition is, therefore, disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
Judge Judge
J.
24.8WP.3977.16
2
C E R T I F I C A T E
“I certify that this Order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Order”.
Uploaded by : Ki. Jeswani, Uploaded on : 25.8.2016.
Diwan Afreen Begum Shamsher & others
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. GAVAI
V.M. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
