Writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn after respondent-UGC stated it would decide the reference within three months, leaving counsel not to press the petition.
None; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
905-WP-4647-15
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO.4641 OF 2015
Dr Avinash Bhaskar Moharil and ors.
-vs-
State of Maharashtra and ors.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Shri B. G. Kulkarni, Advocate for petitioners. Ms Kalyani Deshpande, AGP for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Shri A. S. Agrawal, Advocate for respondent No.5.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & V. M. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : November 22, 2016
Learned counsel for the respondent-UGC makes a statement that the respondent-UGC will decide the reference made to it by the State Government within a period of three months from today.
In that view of the matter, Shri B. G. Kulkarni, the learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the petition. At this stage, petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
JUDGE JUDGE
Asmita
Dr Avinash Bhaskar Moharil and ors.
State of Maharashtra and ors.
B. R. GAVAI
V. M. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
