Allowed
Kum. Anita Chandrasekhar Joshi v. State of Maha., through Its Secretary, Urban Devp. Dept. Mumbai and Others
Bombay HCCAW/2490/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22.11CAW.2490.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
C.A.W. NO. 2490/16 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6332 OF 2015. (Kum. Anita Chandrasekhar Joshi .vs. The State of Maharashtra & others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. Anand Parchure, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. M.K. Pathan, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Atul Bhawsar, Advocate for respondent no. 4.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATED : NOVEMBER 22, 2016.
For the reasons stated, the application is allowed. The amendment be carried out within a period of one week from today.
S.O. for two weeks.
In the meantime, the respondents if they want to file additional reply to meet the challenge, they are at liberty to do so.
Judge
Judge
J.
Kum. Anita Chandrasekhar Joshi
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
V.M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court