Court disposed of the petition as the order dated 9 September 2014 was confined to 2014-15 and no adjudication was made on its legality.
The petition is disposed of without adjudicating on the legality of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
k
1/1
7 civ wp 4633.15 as.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4633 OF 2015
Ajay Gunwant Salunkhe ….. Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….. Respondents
Mr. Chintan Y. Shah i/b Mr. Sandesh D. Patil for the Petitioner. Mr. Manish Pabale, AGP for the Respondents/State.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 26 SEPTEMBR 2016
ORDER:
By the impugned order, the Hon'ble Minister of State of Revenue Department granted a particular spot to the sixth Respondent for excavation of sand for the year 2014-2015. We find from the Farad sheet that there was no ad-interim or interim relief granted. If the order is already acted upon, nothing will survive in the present Petition. In any case, if the order is not acted upon, the same cannot be acted upon as the same was confined to the year 2014-2015. Hence, we need not entertain this Petition. The Petition is disposed of. However we make it clear that no adjudication is made as regards legality and validity of the order dated 9 September 2014.
katkam
1/1
Ajay Gunwant Salunkhe
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. Oka
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
