Dismissed
Ashraf Moinuddin Shaikh and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/25/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp-25.16
Sng
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.25 OF 2016
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
None for the Petitioners. Dr.F.R.Shaikh, APP for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ DATED : 23RD SEPTEMBER 2016
P.C.:
. The learned APP states that the chargesheet is already filed.
(A.A. SAYED, J)
(A.S.OKA, J)
Sng
Respondent Nos. 1 and 2
A.S. OKA
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court