The High Court of Bombay disposed of the contempt petition after granting the petitioner leave to withdraw it with liberty to challenge the underlying order via a separate proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
38-CP-67-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATTE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.67 OF 2016 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.10995 OF 2014
Limbaji Maruti Tapase ...Petitioner
vs.
State of Maharashtra and Others
...Respondents
Mr. C.K. Bhangoji i/b. Mr. R.K. Mendadkar, for the Petitioner Mr. Vikas Mali, AGP for the Respondents.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 13, 2016
P.C.:
. The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to
withdraw the Contempt Petition with liberty to challenge the order dated 26th March, 2015 (Exhibit D) by filing appropriate proceeding.
With the aforesaid liberty, the Contempt Petition is disposed of.
(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
1/1
Vishal Parekar
Limbaji Maruti Tapase
State of Maharashtra
Shantanu Kemkar
Makarand Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
