This judgment is a procedural order recording service of summons and adjournment. The court noted the request by the advocate for the petitioner to serve summons on respondents 1 to 6 on 23/8/17.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 57 OF 2016
High Court Bar Association, Nagpur Thr. ....Petitioner President
V/S
State Of Maharashtra, Dept. Of Higher ....Respondent Education Thr. Principal Secretary, Mumbai And Others
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4364 OF 2013
Archana And Katrina Gorakshan Trust And ....Petitioner Animal Rehabilitation Home Through Its President Av Paradhan
V/S
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Principal ....Respondent Secretary, Marketing Dept. Mumbai And Others
Sudhir M Puranik For Petitioner
Copy Served To G.p./r-1 To 6 Prafulla S. Khubalkar Sunilsingh S. Chauhan For/r-7 For Respondent
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & ROHIT BABAN DEO, JJ DATE : 12th July, 2017
P.C. :
S.o>to 23/8/17 at the request of Adv Puranik for ptr.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL )
Page 1/1
High Court Bar Association, Nagpur
State Of Maharashtra, Dept. Of Higher Education
Archana And Katrina Gorakshan Trust
The State Of Maharashtra
B. P. DHARMADHIKARI
ROHIT BABAN DEO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
