The Criminal Writ Petition was allowed to be withdrawn at the request of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. No substantive proposition of law was laid down in this order.
Withdrawal of the Writ Petition allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP26-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Criminal Writ Petition No.26/2016 (Rajabhau Rambhau Shekokar .vs. The State of Maharashtra and another. )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Mr. S.P. Palshikar, Advocate for Petitioner. Mrs. S.S. Jachak, APP for Respondent No.1. Mr. F.T. Mirza, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & Mrs. Swapna S. Joshi, JJ. DATED : April 27, 2016.
Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn at the request of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
Rajabhau Rambhau Shekokar
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
