Disposed

M/S Vaishnavi Associates through Its Partner v. State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary and Anr.

Bombay HC23 Aug 2016WP/4246/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil Writ Petition arising from a Representation dated 15 December 2014 regarding a non-decision by the State Government. The Court disposed of the petition by directing the respondent to communicate the decision or its status within one month, with a further two-month deadline if pending.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to communicate decision or status of Representation within one month; if pending, final decision within two months upon service of order.

M/S Vaishnavi Associates through Its Partner Vs State… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

1/2

¶3

32 cri wp 4246.15 as.doc

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4246 OF 2015

¶6

M/s. Vaishnavi Associates

¶7

through its Partner ….. Petitioner V/s

¶8

State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary & Anr. ….. Respondents

¶9

Mr. Drupad S. Patil for the Petitioner.

¶10

Mr. P.G. Sawant, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2/State.

¶11

CORAM : A.S. OKA &

¶12

A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 23 AUGUST 2016

¶13

ORDER:

¶14

1 Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the learned AGP for the Respondents/State. Perused the averments made in the Petition. It is contended that the State Government has not decided the Representation dated 15 December 2014 a copy of which is annexed at Exhibit “F” to the Petition. The learned AGP has no instructions about the status of the Representation.

¶15

2 In view of the prayer clause “A” and in view of the aforesaid factual aspect, we dispose of the Petition by passing following order:-

1/2

2/2

32 cri wp 4246.15 as.doc

¶20

i) We direct the Petitioner to produce an authenticated copy of this order in the office of the Principal Secretary of the Urban Development as well as the Directorate of Industries along with a true copy of the Representation dated 15 December 2014;

¶21

ii) If the Representation is already decided, the decision taken on the said Representation to be communicated to the Petitioner within a period of one month from the day on which an authenticated copy of this order is produced in the office of the Principal Secretary;

¶22

iii) If the Representation is still pending, appropriate decision shall be taken by the Respondents within a period of two months from the date on which an authenticated copy of this order is served by the Petitioner;

¶23

Iv) Order passed on the said Representation be communicated to the Petitioner;

¶24

v) If the Petitioner is aggrieved by the said order, it will be open for him to challenge the said order in accordance with law;

¶25

vi) All contentions on merit are kept open;

¶26

vii) The Petition is disposed of on above terms.

¶27

katkam

¶28

2/2

M/S Vaishnavi Associates through Its Partner v. State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Vaishnavi Associates through Its Partner v. State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kunal Ganesh Padmakar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Noor Mohammed Suvarnadurgkar and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Abdul Latif Ibrahim Mahaldar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Amit Murji Nagda Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Amisha Chirag Desai and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Nitin Pandurang Kamble and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra