High Court at Bombay allowed Criminal Application No.4 of 2015 for restoration of the applicant's right to appear in Criminal Writ Petition No.2578 of 2010, finding a case made out due to absence on a specified date.
Application allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appw-4.15.odt
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4 OF 2015
IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2578 OF 2010
Abdul Latif Ibrahim Mahaldar … Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Dhanesh K. Patekar i/by Mr. Raju Digamber Suryawanshi for the Applicant. Mrs. S.V. Sonawane, AGP for the Respondent No.1. Mr. Rakesh Bhatkar for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 22nd AUGUST, 2016
P.C.
1 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant. The learned counsel appearing for the second Respondent and the learned APP for the State. In view of the averments made in the application, a case for restoration is made out as Advocate for the Applicant did not appear on 26th June, 2014.
2 Accordingly, application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for restoration of appearance warrants being allowed.
Abdul Latif Ibrahim Mahaldar
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. OKA
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
