Smt. Neeta W/O Amrut Chawdagor and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Secretary Department of Home, Mumbai and Others

Adv. Harode as also Adv. Sudame appearing for contesting parties have no objection and in fact, they suggest that a competent Mediator should be appointed to look into the dispute.

¶15

Shri Fulzele, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent nos.1 to 3, does not object to appointment of Mediator. He, however, submits that in that situation, present proceedings need not be kept pending and if mediation fails, liberty should be given to aggrieved party to proceed further in accordance with law.

¶16

2107wp413.16

¶17

2/2

¶18

We find substance in the contentions of

¶19

learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶20

Accordingly, we direct Registry of this Court to appoint Mediator for mediation in dispute between the parties.

¶21

Though only for the purpose of mediation, the present proceedings shall be looked into, after conclusion thereof, the parties shall be free to file appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.

¶22

With the above observations and directions, we dispose of criminal writ petition.

¶23

JUDGE JUDGE

¶24

khj

Smt. Neeta W/O Amrut Chawdagor and Another v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Secretary Department of Home, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Neeta W/O Amrut Chawdagor and Another v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Secretary Department of Home, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ku. S.T. Dharmale (Head Master, Kashibai Agrawal Vidyalya) and 3 Others Vs Education Officer (Sec.) Z.P. Amravati and 1 Others

Ramkrishna Sakharam Sahakate and Another Vs the Collector, Nagpur and 2 Others

Prafullkumar S/O. Shrikrishnadas Binzani and Another Vs Shri. a. K. Gandhi, President of Nagpur Shikshan Mandal and Another

Idea Cellular Limited, Nagpur through Its Authorized Representative Shri Girish M. Pawar Vs City of Nagpur Corporation, Thorugh Its Commissioner, Nagpur and 2 Others

Aniruddha Vyankatrao Kendre and Others Vs the Zilla Parishad, Gondia through Its Chief Executive Officer and Others

Young Engineers Education Society Thr. President Devendra Pise Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary Dept. of Higher and Technical Education Mumbai and Others