Disposed

Young Engineers Education Society Thr. President Devendra Pise v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary Dept. of Higher and Technical Education Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC21 Jul 2016WP/3833/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, Nagpur Bench, directed the petitioner to submit compliance by 30/11/2016. The respondent university was ordered to appoint an inspection committee and consider granting first-time affiliation by end-January 2017.

What did the court decide?

Direction to submit compliance by 30/11/2016; direction to university to appoint inspection committee and consider affiliation by end-January 2017.

Young Engineers Education Society Thr. President… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

2107wp3833.16

¶2

1/3

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 3833 OF 2016

¶5

(Young Engineer's Education Society vs. The State of Maharashtra and others)

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

¶7

Shri H.S. Chitaley, Advocate for petitioner.

¶8

Smt. S.Z. Haider, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos.1 and 3.

¶9

Shri B.G. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent no.2.

¶10

CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.

¶11

DATED : JULY 21, 2016

¶12

Heard for some time.

¶13

During hearing, our attention is invited to the fact that the Committee sent by respondent no.2 University has inspected the College of petitioner and submitted inspection report on 16/7/2016.

¶14

Adv. Chitaley for petitioner, upon instructions, states that without prejudice to contentions raised in the petition, all efforts will be made to remove those deficiencies within next four months. He further adds that inspection to find out compliance should thereafter be conducted within reasonable time so that petitioner can, in that event, admit students at least from next academic year, i.e.

2107wp3833.16

2/3

2017-18.

Adv. Kulkarni appearing for respondent no.2 upon instructions states that if compliance report is submitted within a period of four months from today, respondent no.2 University shall complete necessary formalities for consideration of grant of first time affiliation within next two months.

¶19

In view of this position, we direct petitioner to submit necessary compliance by 30/11/2016. Respondent no.2 University shall thereafter again appoint an Inspection Committee and that Committee after conducting inspection, submit a report to the University at the earliest. Respondent no.2 University shall within next two months, i.e. by the end of January 2017 consider eligibility of petitioner for extending to it first time affiliation. With these directions and keeping all rival contentions open, we dispose of writ petition. No costs.

JUDGE JUDGE

khj

2107wp3833.16

3/3

CERTIFICATE

I certify that this order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed order.

¶26

Uploaded by : Uploaded on : Kamal H. Jeswani 22/07/2016 Private Secretary

Young Engineers Education Society Thr. President Devendra Pise v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary Dept. of Higher and Technical Education Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Young Engineers Education Society Thr. President Devendra Pise v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary Dept. of Higher and Technical Education Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ku. S.T. Dharmale (Head Master, Kashibai Agrawal Vidyalya) and 3 Others Vs Education Officer (Sec.) Z.P. Amravati and 1 Others

Ramkrishna Sakharam Sahakate and Another Vs the Collector, Nagpur and 2 Others

Prafullkumar S/O. Shrikrishnadas Binzani and Another Vs Shri. a. K. Gandhi, President of Nagpur Shikshan Mandal and Another

Idea Cellular Limited, Nagpur through Its Authorized Representative Shri Girish M. Pawar Vs City of Nagpur Corporation, Thorugh Its Commissioner, Nagpur and 2 Others

Smt. Neeta W/O Amrut Chawdagor and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Secretary Department of Home, Mumbai and Others

Aniruddha Vyankatrao Kendre and Others Vs the Zilla Parishad, Gondia through Its Chief Executive Officer and Others